7 Comments
User's avatar
Dorothy Li Calzi's avatar

Unregulated and dangerous. Tech has been fighting any kind of regulation since the 90s screwing us all

Paul McElveen's avatar

ABOLISH AI COMPLETELY NOW!!!!!

Kevin's avatar

The decision to pause, or not pause, Astra belongs entirely to OpenAI. They wrote the standard that defines the threshold, and they're the only ones who can decide whether Astra has crossed it. Nobody outside the company, including the public who will live with whatever Astra turns out to be capable of, gets a say.

torchbearercommunity's avatar

OpenAI's post says it can't rule out Critical capability level for Astra. Critical is the top tier in its Preparedness Framework, defined as an AI able to find and exploit zero-days in systems without a human involved. That level of capability is supposed to trigger a halt until safeguards are specified. OpenAI hasn't done that and nothing legally requires it to follow its own rulebook. The one rule that does bind it, SB 53, caps penalties at $1 million per violation only. For a company running $40 billion a year in revenue and pushing a $1 trillion valuation, that is peanuts.

Melissa's avatar

Def regulation required.

nunderland's avatar

An AI generate problems to solve or can it only solve problems created by the human mind?